Showing posts with label Citizen Journalists. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Citizen Journalists. Show all posts

Sunday, March 18, 2007

Blog Hooligans Making A Difference

On Friday, a thoughtful LieStoppers reader forwarded a note that he had received from a colleague. The note described an incident involving a rock thrown at a motorist traveling the Durham Freeway and suggested that this was one in a series of similar incidents that had yet to be reported by the Snooze Room and Durham Police.

"Below is a note I received from a colleague today. It is yet another instance of the local news media ignoring issues that reflect badly on Durham, yet would be of high interest to people living in the area. The "Snooze Room" and DPD are on the job again. Thought you would want to know."

"I just wanted to make everyone aware of something that is happening and has not been in the news. My daughter was going out of town lastnight and driving down the Durham Freeway and a big rock was thrown at their vehicle. Luckily they are ok it hit the dash when it came through. The cops told them this has been going on for ten days but we have seen nothing on the news about it. This is happening around the Alston Ave exit. In fact while the cops were with them writingthe report three more vehicles were hit within a quarter of a mile. Seven vehicles in all last night. Just wanted to make everyone aware so you can be very careful going that way."

Concerned for our local readers, we posted the notice from our kind reader at the LS Forum . An industrious Blog Hooligan, Onlyfactsmatter, forwarded the note to WRAL and WTVD to help further publicize the dangerous crime spree. Within minutes, WRAL’s Julia Lewis had made an inquiry with Durham Police and responded to the inquiry. Incredibly, the Durham Police spokesperson contacted by Ms. Lewis initially denied that any such incidents had occurred. Unwilling to accept the DPD denial, or perhaps trusting the report of a Blog Hooligan more, Ms. Lewis indicated that she would head to Durham to investigate further. By Friday evening, both WRAL and WTVD reported that, despite the initial denial of the Durham Police, the reported incidents had indeed occurred.

“Police in Durham are looking for the person who is dropping objects onto cars driving on the Durham Freeway.

“The latest incident happened Thursday night when someone dropped rocks off the old pedestrian bridge between Alston and Briggs Avenues.

“At Durham's 911 Call Center, four calls came in within 20 minutes as four cars were hit from above.

“Police say while no one was hurt in this latest incident, but they want the rock throwing to stop. So far police have made no arrest, but one officer told Eyewitness News that he's been chasing rock throwing teenagers off the overpass all month.

“Durham police are asking anyone who may have seen something suspicious to call them.

"We encourage you to call 911 regardless of where you are. Not just in Durham but any city. Especially if you're going in the opposite direction because a lot of times you'll be able to see them when they're lining up to catch cars coming under the bridge," Corp. David Addison said.” WTVD

Video of WTVD’s report can be viewed here: WTVD Video.

The recent rash of rock throwing appears to be a repeat of incidents that stretch back several years.

On January 27, 2003 WRAL reported that at least five similar crimes were being investigated.

“Durham police are investigating five incidents in which rocks were thrown off overpasses and caused damage to fast-moving vehicles on the interstate.

“The attacks happened at the Broad Street and Duke Street overpasses in the last week. Police believe someone is using rocks from a construction site as a dangerous weapon. Sunday night, rocks thrown off an overpass above I-85 damaged two vehicles and injured one person.

“A Triad woman was injured when a rock crashed through her window and cut her hand. She was a passenger in a car being driven by her husband.

“None of the other victims was seriously injured.

“The first two attacks in the last week happened on Broad Street, on the same night at the same time. The last two happened on Duke Street, again on the same night at the same time.

“Police say the suspects are probably juveniles playing a prank.

"If I had to give a professional opinion, I'd say it's kids being stupid," said Durham police Capt. C.D. Clark.

"But it can resuilt in a death, and there's nothing stupid about that. That's serious."

“Rocks also were thrown through the windows of a piece of construction equipment parked nearby in the 1700 block of N. Buchanan Blvd.

“It is not known if the same people are responsible for all the incidents.

“Witnesses reported seeing juveniles running from the overpass toward Ruby Street after two of the incidents.

“This is not the first rash of rock-throwing incidents on Durham overpasses. In 1999, a woman was killed when a boulder was dropped onto her car from an overpass.” WRAL

On March 14, 2001, WRAL reported that a man was injured in a rock-throwing incident while also noting a 1991 occurrence that left a Chapel Hill woman dead and a Cumberland County crime that left a teenager permanently disabled.

"Highway accidents happen all the time. You can try to be a safe driver by not tailgating or driving the speed limit, but sometimes there is nothing you can do when someone tries to cause an accident.

"Rakim Wynn was driving home from work late Tuesday night on Highway 70 East, about to cross under the Cheek Road overpass when someone heaved a rock over the side of the bridge.

"It crashed through the windshield, hitting Wynn's arm, the back seat and the roof before coming to a stop.

"I just heard this boom, and I saw a flash of light. At first, I didn't know what it was," he says. "I thought my tire had gone flat or something. I didn't even see the hole at first."

"Lt. Sarvis of the Durham Police Department says the rock probably came from a pile next to the overpass where construction is going on. He does not think this was child's play. Whoever did it will be charged with assault with a deadly weapon.

"We're very fortunate we're not investigating a murder here," he says. "No one's going to convince me they did not know the inherent danger of throwing a 40-pound rock that size off of a bridge."

"I guess God was with me that night. Basically, I didn't crash, and I didn't get killed. I just got a graze on the arm," Wynn says.

"Almost two years ago to the day, a rock changed a Canadian teenager's life forever. In March 1999, Michael Vytlingam suffered permanent brain damage when a rock crashed through the windshield of his SUV.

"Doctors say he can now walk and talk but will be disabled for life. Police arrested two teenagers almost a year later for throwing the rock from an I-95 overpass in Cumberland County.

"A Chapel Hill woman also died in 1991 when a 60-pound boulder was dropped from a Durham freeway overpass." WRAL

On March 25, 1999, WRAL reported on another series of Durham rock throwing incidents.

"Someone who likes to throw rocks at cars and trucks is targeting drivers in Durham. Six vehicles were hit in 45 minutes Friday night on the Durham Freeway.

"Windshields were damaged, but no one was injured.

"Most people probably do not think about it as they are driving along the highway. But, there is a chance that someone could throw a rock off of an overpass and hit a car.

"Boom! That's exactly what it sounded like, and it hit with a loud impact," said truck
driver Marvin McCaden.

"McCaden was driving along the Durham Freeway Thursday night. When he passed under the railroad crossing near Duke University Medical Center, a rock slammed into his passenger door. The damage does not look that bad, but it could have been much worse.

"About 12 inches higher. If it came through that window, that window doesn't shatter like a windshield. That window would actually just break like a house pane, and I'm sure I would have been hurt," said McCaden.

"Durham police think the situation is serious. They showed WRAL reports of six drivers, all hit in the same area, within 45 minutes, most likely with rocks like the ones that cover the railroad overpass.

"I really feel this is some young people who have too much time on their hands and, evidently, not enough supervision, and if they need to occupy their time, we'll occupy their time," said Cpl. Fran Borden.

"It's a serious situation and we need to get whoever is responsible out of the picture, because we don't need that kind of problem here in Durham," said McCaden.

Despite initially denying record of the rock throwing incidents, despite the WTVD and WRAL reports of multiple recent incidents, and despite a long-running history of similar crimes, the Durham Police would later admit to a single occurrence. Not surprisingly, the Snooze Room willingly passed along the apparent misinformation.

“Durham police are investigating rock-throwing incidents that damaged several vehicles on the Durham Freeway late Thursday, according to Durham police spokesman Cpl. David Addison.

“Three vehicles were struck by falling projectiles around 6:30 p.m. on N.C. 147 after traveling under the Briggs Avenue overpass. Only one of the three vehicles suffered damage serious enough to result in a documented police report, Addison said.

“The single reported rock-throwing incident was the first of its kind Addison could find in Durham police reports filed in the past week. Addison said there have been
rumors of a growing trend of similar incidents here.” Snooze Room Crime Log

It is difficult to understand why Durham Police would initially deny and then downplay the reports.

The dangerous rock throwing is not a circumstance unique to Durham. Similar reports can be found across the country. The most disturbing is a rash of 1992 incidents along a ten mile stretch of Jacksonville's I-295, described by Tom Brokaw as the "highway from hell." Starting in June of 1992, the rock throwing escalated into sniper and vehicle to vehicle shootings over the next few months. In total, the Florida incidents, which appear to remain unsolved, resulted in 36 confirmed crimes and 120 unverified incidents that left one person dead, another permanently disfigured, and at least two others injured.

While it is disappointing that Durham Police, rather than informing the public of the dangerous situation, initially denied the reports before eventually appearing to downplay the dangers, it is heartening to witness citizen journalists again making a difference.

Saturday, March 17, 2007

Citizen Journalist Reports on IWF Forum

One of the most rewarding aspects of watching the LieStoppers community grow over the past several months has been witnessing the emergence of several citizen journalists who have taken it upon themselves to attend and report on Hoax hearings, press conferences, community meetings, panel discussions, and similar events. The willingness of LS Forum members to not only attend these events but also to share their observations with the balance of the LS community allows the LS sites to offer comprehensive, first person commentary in near real time while helping define the LS sites as the vehicle of collective empowerment they were intended to be.
.
Previously, we have been enlightened by Locomotive Breath's detailed account of the Shut Up and Teach forum, Kemp's Happy Hour Updates, and his description of the Charlotte stop of President Brodhead's "conversation" tour. Details of several other similar ventures can be found throughout the LS Forum. The most recent example of our merry band of citizen journalists going out of their way to provide timely comprehensive reports on current events is brought to us by MomToThree.
.
On Thursday, the Independent Women’s Forum hosted a discussion exploring the legal, academic, and media conduct that helped fuel the Hoax. Panelists included Stuart Taylor Jr., senior writer and columnist for National Journal magazine, Christina Hoff Sommers, author of Who Stole Feminism? and The War against Boys, and IWF's Allison Kasic, who was featured on the cover of the New York Times Magazine in May 2003 as one of the top student activists in the country. CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin moderated the panel which was titled, "What Went Wrong at Duke?".
.
LS Forum member and occasional LS Blog contributor, MomToThree (A Duke Mom Responds to Stuart Rojstaczer, Our Collective Voice #2 ), had the opportunity to attend the forum and offered the following observations at the LS Forum:
  • A very team-friendly crowd of about sixty people.
  • No enablers or dissenters, at least none who made themselves known.
  • Also several Duke moms spoke up from the audience.
  • All the panelists were great - no real news (except one possible comment by Stuart Taylor, which I'll describe tomorrow), but the two lawyers, Toobin and Taylor, were very upbeat about the charges being dropped. (No mention of the photo op today, though).
  • Taylor was the most specifically knowledgeable about the case.
  • Toobin was pretty knowledgeable.
  • Sommers and Kasic stayed focused on the administration/faculty/academic issues.
  • All the panelists used very strong language in everything they said - I mean didn't mince words. The case just brings out superlatives in trying to express the outrage.
  • The crowd cheered when Liestoppers and Durham in Wonderland were mentioned!!!

Supplementing her initial report, MomToThree also gave LS Forum members additional insight by sharing her well written and easy to follow notes taken at the IWF event:

  • There were about sixty people present, about an even mix of men and women. Some journalists.
  • Michele Bernard, President of IWF, introduced the program and the panel. She started out with rape is a serious crime, rape allegations are serious, and false accusations of rape are serious – they hurt actual rape victims and especially they hurt the falsely accused who could carry the taint of these accusations for years. She then introduced the panel.
  • The format used was that Jeff Toobin stood at the podium and asked specific questions of the panelist. They gave five to ten minute answers. Then Toobin solicited questions from the audience.
  • [JT] Quotes a law school professor to the effect that “some crimes are so important that even innocence is no defense.” From the beginning this case has been seen as a metaphor for something else, e.g., for 19th century race relations. As more came out, other metaphors applied, seen as metaphor for – gender relations, university life, law enforcement. Stuart Taylor was one of the only journalists who actually took an independent look at the evidence. Asks ST how he became interested in the case.
  • [ST] Mentions that a friend of his has a son on the Duke lacrosse team. When the case broke, his friend called him and asked him to look into it. Said there had been no rape and no sex of any kind. ST said he would look at it. Became clear to him early that there was low probability that a rape had happened. Accuser had low credibility to begin with. Then there were the DNA tests. Mike Nifong specifically said that the DNA test would identify the guilty and rule out the innocent. March 28, Nifong got DNA test results and on April 10, the defense announced that the results are negative for any lacrosse players. But Mike Nifong didn’t want it to be over. Besides the negative DNA, there were also photos from the party that supported the players’ story. One of the accused also had an airtight alibi. All together, this evidence suggested to ST that the players were “very probably innocent.” At that point, ST was not ready to say that there was “certainty” that the accused were innocent. This was because Nifong had characterized the medical evidence as *showing* that a rape had occurred. When the medical evidence finally got to the Defense in May [and it did not show what Nifong claimed], that clinched it for ST.
  • [JT] What’s happening now with the case is that Mike Nifong is out – there is a top to bottom review by the Attorney General of North Carolina. JT expect dismissal of the charges soon.
  • JT asks AK: As a much younger person and more recent student, what do you think of the role of Duke and its response? What about Duke culture?
  • [AK] The mistakes that Duke made, not surprisingly, point to larger flaws in the academic system. “Duke” encompasses a lot of people, but let’s start with the administration and trustees. They adopted a “guilty until proven innocent attitude.” They did not stand up for the students as Mike Nifong trampled all over their due process rights. They ended the season, they suspended the players, fired the coach. They played it safe to the extreme. They hung the students out to dry. Yes, they were placed in a tough position. No school wants this situation, but they “had the opportunity to enforce the basic values of our justice system” Instead, they let the New Black Panther Party on campus. They allowed a chaotic environment to just thrive until December. Anyone could see that the prosecutor’s office had made mistakes – that there were problems in the process, whether the accused were guilty or innocent. The administration’s response was to form a bunch of committees which called for such irrelevant things as more minority professors and minority scholarships, more room on campus for student activities.
  • [JT] Asks CHS what she thinks the case tells us about feminism?
  • [CHS] It tells us there is a serious problem with hard line feminism on our campuses – there is a steady diet of anti-male hatred, compares it to hatred being taught in madrassas – it’s propaganda. She briefly reads from a text used in a women’s studies class. Text is called “Sexual Terrorism.” Says all women are targets and live under a system in which men scare and control females through violence. These [women’s studies] classes use an egregiously false body of information, myths and false statistics, such as the claim, reprinted in the New York Times, that on Super Bowl Sunday, battery against women increases 40%.. There was never a source found for this statistic, it was manufactured, but the media loved it. – example of “too good to check.” This type of feminism built on “hate statistics.” Some 10-15% of women exposed to this on campus get carried away with it, they get “intoxicated by hatred.”She is not sure what to make of Mike Nifong, some kind of mysterious, confused character, but would he have done this without support from Duke faculty, from the Group of 88 types. Mentions Kim Curtis who gave a lacrosse player in her class an ‘F’. There is a climate of anger, in which men exist in a milieu of disapproval – in which the worst case male is treated as the norm. The case was a trifecta of race, class, gender. The Duke three walked into a trap. Need to address this climate of hatred that is thriving on campus. This case was “manna from heaven” for certain people. Even now they don’t want to give it up.
  • [JT] Asks ST, what is the relationship between Mike Nifong’s reelection and the case? What pushed him forward? JT mentions that, in his own reporting, he found people saying Mike Nifong was a normal guy.
  • [ST] Yes, but he does have screaming mad fits to people he can intimidate. Nifong was on his way to losing to Freda Black. Had told the Governor who appointed him that he would not run. Freda Black better known candidate because of Petersen case. You could tell the lawyers were betting on Black, because she was getting their contributions. Biggest concern for Nifong was actually his pension. The case was like “manna from heaven.” It instantly made him famous…got him the black vote.
  • [JT] Asks AK to discuss the Group of 88’s Listening Statement.
  • [AK] The Ad was a “template for attitudes.” Ad asserted “something happened.” …grand statements followed by over-the-top conclusions. One of the protests was organized by a visiting member of the English department… so some activists not that close to Duke. Not surprisingly, the ad has since been removed from the Duke server, though still can be found on the internet. The Group signed on to the ad, but when questioned later, said things like…”if you think we were saying the players were guilty, that is your prejudice.” Mentions Lubiano’s comment that the ad was intended to be “a stake through the heart of the lacrosse team.”
  • [ST] Said he agrees with what AK just said, but thinks it is “understated.” “Many of these people are haters…they are not making a mistake.”
  • [JT] Asks CHS: Where does the demand for this [radical feminism] come from? Parents are not looking for it….attitudes well outside the mainstream…How does it get so entrenched?
  • [CHS] Faculties are “way to the left” of society. Faculties “don’t see themselves as accountable.”…world unto themselves….there was a generational shift…the old liberals died out…the new generation are “more radical, more hard core left.” Duke is “notorious for its strangely left-wing English department” and ethnic studies. CHS told this anecdote. At the University of MD, some women were inspired by a class they took to paper the school with posters which used random photos of male students from the directory and the words “This man is a potential rapist.” They were very satisfied with their work.
  • [JT] Asks ST about media coverage.
  • [ST] cites ones that were a “disgrace”: Raleigh New & Observer, Herald-Sun, New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, USA Today, lots of others….jumped on the “presumption of guilt” bandwagon. Examples: N&O March 25 interview with the accuser [ST read excerpts from the article, highlighting extremely biased wording]. New York Times, Salina Roberts, sports columnist, March 31st, “Bonded on Barbarity,” which compared the players and their supposed “wall of silence” to drug dealers and gang members engaged in anti-snitch campaigns.. Dan Abrams was an “honorable exception.” Also mentions Chris Cuomo. Otherwise, a “complete indifference to the evidence.”
  • [CHS] Recalls reading the Duff Wilson article from August. Before reading the article, CHS says she had dismissed the case entirely, but after reading Wilson, she wondered whether there maybe was something there.
  • [ST] Jumps in to say that Liestoppers, within a few hours, had “shredded” the Wilson article “from top to bottom.”…”an amazing performance of journalism on the fly.”
  • [AK] Brings up 60 Minutes. Says it seems to have been “the tipping point” for many, because could hear the kids’ side of the story in their own words. Mentions K.C, Johnson…really a problem [for the media] that the best reporting is from him. Also mentions Charlotte Allen’s piece in the Weekly Standard.

To read the balance of MomToThree's report, which includes a very detailed description of the Q&A that concluded the forum, please visit the LS Fourm. Approximately twenty four hours after MomToThree’s offering, IWF now has a video available if you'd like to view the forum in full.