“Gerri Lomuriel Wilkes, who was working at the center the morning the accuser came in, took hand-written notes of her observations . . .”“District Attorney Mike Nifong has told defense lawyers during discovery hearings that no notes were made at the center, that only a log existed from there.”
Monday, September 18, 2006
The News and Observer is reporting that defense attorneys for the Duke Three have filed a new motion again requesting additional discovery that appears to have been withheld from them. Despite DA Nifong’s repeated denials that any records were kept at Durham Access, where the accuser first made her claims against the accused lacrosse players in response to a staffers direct question, at least one of the three women that the accuser interacted with took hand written notes of her observations. It should be noted that it was previously reported that the Durham Police Department failed to interview either of the three Durham Access staffers after the day the Hoax began.
From the N&O:
This further revelation that there remains additional discovery which Mr. Nifong had specifically denied even existed comes as no surprise. It does, however, shed light on the “Nifong must have something” theme. It appears that Mr. Nifong does have something after all. Something as in an awful lot of discovery that has been withheld from the defense, Something as in terminally enflamed pants, and Something as in an awfully guilty conscience.
Just how many times does this man need to be caught by his own deception before this Hoax ends?Publish